Proposed Amendments to Chronic Wasting Disease Comprehensive Rules

Please limit submissions to one per person.

Summary

• English Summary
• Resumen en español

DISEASE DETECTION AND RESPONSE RULES

PROPOSAL PREAMBLE

1. Introduction.

        The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department proposes amendments to 31 TAC §§65.90, 65.92, 65.98, and 65.99, concerning Disease Detection and Response.

        CWD is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder that affects some cervid species, including white-tailed deer, mule deer, elk, red deer, sika, and their hybrids (referred to collectively as susceptible species). It is classified as a TSE (transmissible spongiform encephalopathy), a family of diseases that includes scrapie (found in sheep), bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, found in cattle and commonly known as “Mad Cow Disease”), and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) in humans.

        Much remains unknown about CWD, although robust efforts to increase knowledge are underway in many states and countries. The peculiarities of its transmission (how it is passed from animal to animal), infection rate (the frequency of occurrence through time or other comparative standard), incubation period (the time from exposure to clinical manifestation), and potential for transmission to other species are still being investigated. Currently, scientific evidence suggests that CWD has zoonotic potential; however, no confirmed cases of CWD have been found in humans. Consequently, both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization strongly recommend testing animals taken in areas where CWD exists, and if positive, recommend not consuming the meat. What is known is that CWD is invariably fatal to certain species of cervids and is transmitted both directly (through animal-to-animal contact) and indirectly (through environmental contamination). If CWD is not contained and controlled, the implications of the disease for Texas and its multi-billion-dollar ranching, hunting, wildlife management, and real estate economies could be significant.

        The department has engaged in several rulemakings over the years to address the threat posed by CWD, including rules to designate a system of zones in areas where CWD has been confirmed. The purpose of those CWD zones is to determine the geographic extent and prevalence of the disease while containing it by limiting the unnatural movement of live CWD-susceptible species as well as the movement of carcass parts.

        The department’s response to the emergence of CWD in captive and free-ranging populations is guided by the department’s CWD Management Plan (Plan) https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/diseases/cwd/plan.phtml. Developed in 2012 in consultation with the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC), other governmental entities and conservation organizations, and various advisory groups consisting of landowners, hunters, deer managers, veterinarians, and epidemiologists, the Plan sets forth the department’s CWD management strategies and informs regulatory responses to the detection of the disease in captive and free-ranging cervid populations in the state of Texas. The Plan is intended to be dynamic; in fact, it must be so in order to accommodate the growing understanding of the etiology, pathology, and epidemiology of the disease and the potential management pathways that emerge as it becomes better understood through time. The Plan proceeds from the premise that disease surveillance and active management of CWD once it is detected are critical to containing it on the landscape.

        As noted previously in this preamble, the department has been engaged in a long-term effort to stem the spread of CWD; however, by 2021 it was apparent that more robust measures were warranted because CWD was still being detected in additional deer breeding facilities, as well as on multiple release sites associated with CWD-positive deer breeding facilities. The commission adopted those rules, which require higher rates of testing, ante-mortem (live-animal) testing of breeder deer prior to release, and enhanced recordkeeping and reporting measures, in December of 2021 (46 TexReg 8724).

        Following the implementation of more efficacious testing requirements, an unprecedented increase in CWD detections occurred. Since 2021, CWD has been detected in 22 deer breeding facilities, two release sites associated with CWD-positive deer breeding facilities, and two free-ranging deer in areas where CWD had not been previously detected. Department records indicate that within the last five years those breeding facilities transferred over 7,000 deer to other breeding facilities, release sites, and Deer Management Permit (DMP) sites. All those locations are therefore directly connected to the CWD-positive facilities and are subsequently of epidemiological concern. Additionally, approximately 287 deer breeding facilities received deer from one or more of the directly connected breeding facilities, which means those facilities (referred to as “Tier 1” facilities) are indirectly connected to the positive facilities and are also of epidemiological concern because they have received exposed deer that were in a trace-out breeding facility.

        Because of this rapid explosion in epidemiological linkages between deer breeding facilities and associated release sites, the department became concerned about the excessive numbers of deer breeders continuing to be affected by inter-facility transfers, and subsequently determined that additional testing measures could increase the probability of detecting CWD in breeding facilities where it exists before it could be spread to additional breeding facilities and associated release sites. In addition to enhancing the department’s ability to contain CWD where it is discovered, the additional testing measures also advanced the agency’s desire to identify methods to provide relief to the regulated community without compromising the agency’s statutory duty to protect and conserve native wildlife resources. Continuing along that trajectory, the rules as proposed would effect a number of changes to the current rules that would provide relief to the regulated community, in addition to other changes intended to streamline, simplify, and reduce regulatory requirements for hunters.

        The proposed amendment to §65.90, concerning Definitions, would eliminate the definition for and references to “Tier 1” facilities, for reasons more thoroughly discussed elsewhere in this preamble in the proposed amendment to §65.99, concerning Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD; Positive Deer Breeding Facilities.

        The proposed amendment to §65.92, concerning CWD Testing, would require the euthanization and post-mortem testing of any breeder deer confirmed positive for CWD via ante-mortem testing. Under current rule, only deer that die in a deer breeding facility or deer that test positive via ante-mortem testing in a deer breeding facility that is epidemiologically connected to a positive deer breeding facility are required to be post-mortem tested for CWD. The immediate post-mortem testing of deer confirmed positive via ante-mortem testing results in the immediate removal of a possible infectious animals and a method for continuing evaluation of the efficacy of ante-mortem testing, which is not as reliable as post-mortem for definitive disease diagnosis.

        The proposed amendment to §65.98, concerning Transition Provisions, would make changes necessary to comport the rules with a rulemaking that took effect earlier this year (49 TexReg 267). In that rulemaking, the department amended §65.98 to implement a 60-day deadline for the submission of tissue samples from breeding facilities epidemiologically connected to deer infected with CWD, as well as to eliminate provisions allowing external nursing facilities for breeder deer. Those changes could not be made in the sections where they properly belong (§65.99, concerning Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD; Positive Deer Breeding Facilities) because that section was itself the subject of a rulemaking that had not yet taken effect, which rendered it ineligible for amendment at the time. Now that the amendment to §65.99 has taken effect, the changes to §65.98 can be removed and placed in §65.99 where they belong, which is accomplished in this rulemaking.

        The proposed amendment to §65.99, concerning Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD; Positive Deer Breeding Facilities, would eliminate the “Tier 1” category of deer breeding facilities and the testing requirements for such facilities. As mentioned previously in this preamble, the department is committed to avoiding unnecessary regulatory burdens associated with the spread of CWD by the regulated community of persons who are authorized to possess, breed, and transfer live deer. As part of this effort, the department considers that rules adopted in December, 2021 (46 TexReg 8724) that without question improved the efficacy of the department’s surveillance efforts for captive deer populations, in concert with recently adopted rules (48 TexReg 5146) requiring the ante-mortem testing of breeder deer prior to transfer to another deer breeder appear to have introduced a level of confidence sufficient for the department to eliminate the need for the category of “Tier 1” facilities for purposes of CWD management. “Tier 1“ breeding facilities are facilities that received an exposed deer that was in a “trace-out” breeding facility (a breeding facility that received an exposed deer from a CWD-positive breeding facility). The precepts of epidemiological investigation dictate the creation of a record of the movements of individual animals that may have come into contact with an infected animal or environment, as well as the tracing of the movement of animals that may have come into contact with animals that may have come into contact with an infected animal or environment. By creating a movement history for deer entering and leaving a facility where a positive deer has been found, the department is able to employ surveillance and testing regimes that can exclude animals and facilities from the suspicion of harboring CWD. Eliminating the “Tier 1” designation would not only result in MQ designation for breeding facilities currently designated NMQ, it would also allow the department to redirect limited resources to other avenues of CWD response.  The proposed amendment also incorporates provisions from §65.98, concerning Transition Provisions, for the reasons set forth in the discussion to the proposed amendment to that section elsewhere in this preamble. As mentioned previously in this preamble in the discussion to the proposed amendment to §65.98, the department in a previous rulemaking placed provisions regarding nursing facilities and tissue sample submission deadlines in that section because the section where they more properly and intuitively belonged (§65.99) was unavailable for the amendment. The proposed amendment accomplishes the transfer of those provisions to §65.99. 

2. Fiscal Note.

        Robert Macdonald, Regulations Coordinator, has determined that for each of the first five years that the rules as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications to state and local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules as proposed, as department personnel currently allocated to the administration and enforcement of disease management activities will administer and enforce the rules as part of their current job duties and resources.

3. Public Benefit/Cost Note.

        Mr. Macdonald also has determined that for each of the first five years the amendments as proposed are in effect:

        (A) The public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the rules as proposed will be a reduction of the probability of CWD being spread from locations where it might exist and an increase in the probability of detecting CWD if it does exist, thus ensuring the public of continued enjoyment of the resource and also ensuring the continued beneficial economic impacts of hunting in Texas.

        (B) There will be an adverse economic impact on persons required to comply with the rules as proposed. Those costs are identical to the costs of compliance for small and microbusinesses discussed later in this preamble.

        (C) Under provisions of Government Code, Chapter 2006, a state agency must prepare an economic impact statement and a regulatory flexibility analysis for a rule that may have an adverse economic effect on small businesses and micro-businesses. Those guidelines state that an agency need only consider a proposed rule’s "direct adverse economic impacts" to small businesses and micro-businesses to determine if any further analysis is required. For that purpose, the department considers "direct economic impact" to mean a requirement that would directly impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements; impose taxes or fees; result in lost sales or profits; adversely affect market competition; or require the purchase or modification of equipment or services.

        Government Code, §2006.001(1), defines a small or micro-business as a legal entity "formed for the purpose of making a profit" and "independently owned and operated." A micro-business is a business with 20 or fewer employees. A small business is defined as a business with fewer than 100 employees, or less than $6 million in annual gross receipts.  The department has determined that the proposed rule could result in direct economic costs to small businesses and microbusinesses. Department data indicate that there are approximately 731 permitted deer breeders in Texas as of the preparation of this analysis. Although the department does not require deer breeders to file financial information with the department, the department believes that most if not all deer breeders would qualify as a small or micro-business. Since the rule if adopted would require a permitted deer breeder that receives confirmation of CWD via an ante-mortem test to euthanize that animal and submit tissues for post-mortem CWD testing, the adverse economic impacts are the cost to euthanize and test a breeder deer. The cost of euthanizing a deer can range from very little (if the breeder dispatches a deer by firearm) to the costs associated with veterinary services, which the department estimates should not exceed $300. The cost of post-mortem CWD testing administered by the Texas A&M Veterinary Medicine Diagnostic Lab (TVMDL is a minimum of $27, to which is added an $8 accession fee (which may cover multiple samples submitted at the same time). If a whole head is submitted to TVDML there is an additional $23 sample collection fee, plus a $23 disposal fee. Thus, the fee for testing would be $35, plus any veterinary cost (which the department cannot quantify, because practice models vary widely across the state). The fee for submitting an entire head for testing would be $81. Because the nature of the market for breeder deer is fluid and the department does not require sale prices of breeder deer to be reported, the department has no way to determine the exact value of lost sales resulting from the euthanization of breeder deer; however, anecdotal and publicly available information suggests that the purchase cost of a breeder deer can range from hundreds of dollars to many thousands of dollars. Thus, a deer breeder who euthanizes a deer under the rules as proposed would be unable to sell that deer and, assuming the deer in question would be sold (not all breeder deer all sold), would incur a lost sale value of between hundreds of dollars and many thousands of dollars.

        There will be no impact on rural communities, as the rules regulate permitted deer breeders and do not directly or indirectly regulate any community.

        Several alternatives were considered to achieve the goals of the proposed rules while reducing potential adverse impacts on small and micro-businesses and persons required to comply.

        One alternative was to do nothing. This alternative was rejected because the presence of CWD in breeding facilities and free-ranging populations presents an actual, direct threat to free-ranging and captive cervid populations and the economies that depend upon them. The repeated additional discoveries of CWD in captive and free-range populations indicates that additional measures are necessary to prevent the spread of CWD from locations where it may exist. Therefore, because the department has a statutory duty to protect and conserve the wildlife resources of the state and current rules do not achieve the necessary level of vigilance needed to detect the presence and/or spread of CWD between breeding facilities, this alternative was rejected. The department does note that the removal of the “Tier 1” designation for deer breeding facilities, in concert with the requirement to euthanize and post-mortem test breeder that are confirmed via ante-mortem testing to be infected with CWD, will provide some deer breeders with the ability to return to normal operations.

        Another alternative would be an absolute prohibition on the movement of deer within the state for any purpose. While this alternative would significantly reduce the potential spread of CWD, it would deprive deer breeders of the ability to engage in the business of buying and selling breeder deer. Therefore, this alternative was rejected because the department determined that it placed an avoidable burden on the regulated community.

        Another alternative would be imposing less stringent testing requirements. This alternative was rejected because the testing requirements in the proposed rules will provide additional confidence than is possible under current disease-testing requirements to determine that CWD is or is not present. Less stringent testing requirements would reduce confidence and therefore impair the ability of the department to respond in the event that CWD actually is present. Less stringent testing requirements also could result in the spread of CWD to additional breeding facilities, which would be prohibited from transferring deer, which would, in turn, result in the total loss of sales opportunity. The department also believes that enhanced testing measures are necessary to provide assurance to the hunting public, private landowners, and the regulated community that healthy wildlife resources are available for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.

        (D) The department has not drafted a local employment impact statement under the Administrative Procedures Act, §2001.022, as the agency has determined that the rules as proposed will not result in direct impacts to local economies.

        (E) The department has determined that Government Code, §2001.0225 (Regulatory Analysis of Major Environmental Rules), does not apply to the proposed rules.

        (F) The department has determined that there will not be a taking of private real property, as defined by Government Code, Chapter 2007, as a result of the proposed rules. Any impacts resulting from the discovery of CWD in or near private real property would be the result of the discovery of CWD and not the proposed rule.

        (G) In compliance with the requirements of Government Code, §2001.0221, the department has prepared the following Government Growth Impact Statement (GGIS). The rules as proposed, if adopted, will:

                 (1) neither create nor eliminate a government program;

                 (2) not result in an increase or decrease in the number of full-time equivalent employee needs;

                 (3) not result in a need for additional General Revenue funding;

                 (4) not affect the amount of any fee;

                 (5) not create a new regulation or repeal an existing regulation, but will limit an existing regulation (by eliminating the “Tier 1” category of deer breeding facility);

                 (6) not increase the number of individuals subject to regulation; and

                 (7) not positively or adversely affect the state’s economy.

4. Request for Public Comment.

        Comments on the proposed rules may be submitted to Dr. Hunter Reed, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas, 78744; (830) 890-1230 (e-mail: jhunter.reed@tpwd.texas.gov); or via the department’s website at www.tpwd.texas.gov.

5. Statutory Authority.

        The amendments are proposed under the authority of Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter L, which authorizes the commission to make regulations governing the possession, transfer, purchase, sale, of breeder deer held under the authority of the subchapter; and §61.021, which provides that no person may possess a game animal at any time or in any place except as permitted under a proclamation of the commission.

        The proposed amendments affect Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter L, and Chapter 61.

6. Rule Text.

        §65.90. Definitions. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings, except in cases where the context clearly indicates otherwise.

                 (1) – (20) (No change.)

                 (21) Last known exposure — The last date a deer in a trace-out or trace-in breeding facility was exposed to a trace deer prior to the death or transfer of that trace deer[, or the last date an exposed deer entered a Tier 1 facility].

                 (22) – (36 (No change.)

                 [(37) Tier 1 facility — A breeding facility that has received an exposed deer that was in a trace-out breeding facility.]

                 (37)[(38)] Trace deer — A deer that the department has determined had been in a CWD-positive deer breeding facility on or after the date the facility was first exposed to CWD, if known; otherwise, within the previous five years from the reported mortality date of the CWD-positive deer, or the date of the ante-mortem test result.

                 (38) [(39)] Trace-in breeding facility — A breeding facility that meets either of the following criteria:

                         (A) the facility has transferred a deer directly to a CWD-positive facility within the five-year period preceding the reported mortality date of a CWD-positive deer in the facility (or the date of the positive ante-mortem test result); or

                         (B) the facility has possessed a deer that was transferred indirectly (i.e., by way of an intermediary breeding facility or facilities) to a CWD-positive facility within the five-year period preceding the reported mortality date of a CWD-positive deer in the facility, or the date of the positive ante-mortem test result.

                 (39)[(40)] Trace-out breeding facility — A breeding facility that has received an exposed deer that was in a CWD-positive deer breeding facility.

                 (40)[(41)] Trap Site — A specific tract of land approved by the department for the trapping of deer under this chapter and Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapters E, L, R, and R-1.

                 (41)[(42)] Triple T permit — A permit to trap, transport, and transplant white-tailed or mule deer (Triple T permit) issued under the provisions of Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter E, and Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Permits for Trapping, Transporting, and Transplanting Game Animals and Game Birds).

                 (42)[(43)] Trap, Transport and Process (TTP) permit — A permit issued under the provisions of Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter E, and Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Permits for Trapping, Transporting, and Transplanting Game Animals and Game Birds), to trap, transport, and process surplus white-tailed deer (TTP permit).

                 (43)[(44)] TWIMS — The department’s Texas Wildlife Information Management Services (TWIMS) online application.

        §65.92. CWD Testing.

                 (a) – (j) (No change.)

                 (k) Upon notification by the department that CWD is suspected in a deer as a result of ante-mortem testing in a facility, the facility is automatically NMQ and the permittee shall:

                         (1) euthanize the positive deer within seven days of confirmation of the positive test result; and

                         (2) submit post-mortem test samples from breeder deer euthanized under this subsection within one business day of euthanasia, to include both ears and the identification tag required under Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter L.

                 (l)[(k)] All CWD test samples shall be submitted to an accredited testing laboratory within seven days of collection.

        §65.98. Transition Provisions.

                 [(a)] A release site that was not in compliance with the applicable testing requirements of this division in effect between August 15, 2016 and the effective date of this section shall be:

                         (1) required to comply with the applicable provisions of this division regarding CWD testing with respect to release facilities; and

                         (2) ineligible to be a release site for breeder deer or deer transferred pursuant to a Triple T permit or DMP until the release site has complied with paragraph (1) of this section.

                 [(b) To the extent that any provision of this subsection conflicts with the provisions of §65.99(e) of this title (relating to Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD; Positive Breeding Facilities), this section controls. Tissue samples required by §65.99(e)(2)(E) of this title shall be submitted within 60 days of notification by the department of Category B status.]

                 [(c) As of the effective date of this subsection, the provisions of §65.99(i) of this title cease effect.]

        §65.99. Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD; Positive Deer Breeding Facilities.

                 (a) Effectiveness.

                         (1) To the extent that any provision of this section conflicts with any provision of this division, the provisions of this section prevail.

                         (2) The provisions of Division 1 of this subchapter apply to any facility designated by the department as a Category A or Category B trace-out breeding facility, [Tier 1 breeding facility,] or trace-in breeding facility subject to the provisions of this section.

                 (b) – (d) (No change.)

        (e) Category B trace-out breeding facility.

                         (1) A Category B facility is a trace-out breeding facility in which less than 100% of the trace deer that department records indicate were received by the facility are for whatever reason (including but not limited to transfer, release, or escape) available for testing.

                         (2) Immediately upon notification by the department of Category B status; a facility is automatically NMQ and the permittee shall:

                                  (A) – (E) (No change.)

                                  (F) The tissues samples required by subparagraph (E) of this paragraph shall be submitted within 60 days of notification by the department of Category B status.

                         (3) – (6) (No change.)

                 [(f) Tier 1 facility.]

                         [(1) Upon notification by the department of Tier 1 status, a facility is automatically NMQ and the permittee shall:]

                                  [(A) inspect the facility daily for mortalities;]

                                  [(B) immediately report all test-eligible deer mortalities that occur within the facility; and

                                  [(C) immediately collect test samples from all test-eligible deer mortalities that occur within the facility and submit for post-mortem testing within one business day of collection.]

                         [(2) A permittee may request the development of a custom testing plan as provided in subsection (h) of this section; provided, however, the permittee must comply with the provisions of paragraph (1)(A) — (C) of this subsection.]

                         [(3) The department will not restore MQ status unless the permittee has complied with all applicable requirements of this subsection and this division, and any one of the following:

                                  [(A) post-mortem results of "not detected" have been submitted for every exposed deer received from a trace facility; or]

                                  [(B) the department has restored MQ status to all trace facilities from which deer were received; or]

                                  [(C) the permittee has conducted ante-mortem testing as specified in subsection (e)(2)(E) of this section; or]

                                  [(D) the permittee has conducted testing as specified in compliance with the provisions of a custom testing plan under the provisions of subsection (h) of this section to the satisfaction of the department and TAHC.]

                                  [(4) The department in consultation with TAHC may decline to authorize a custom testing plan under subsection (h) of this section if an epidemiological assessment determines that a custom testing plan is inappropriate.]

                 (f)[(g)] Trace-in breeding facility. Immediately upon notification by the department of trace-in facility status, a facility is automatically NMQ.

                         (1) – (3) (No change.)

                         (4) In lieu of the testing requirements prescribed in this subsection, a permittee may request the development of a custom testing plan as provided in subsection (g)[(h)] of this section; provided however, the permittee must comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection.

                         (5) The department in consultation with TAHC may decline to authorize a custom testing plan under subsection (g)[(h)] of this section if an epidemiological assessment determines that a custom testing plan is inappropriate.

                         (6) The department will not restore MQ status unless CWD "not detected" test results are obtained for all required sample submissions and the permittee has complied with all applicable requirements of this subsection and this division.

                 (g)[(h)] Custom Testing Plan. Within seven days of being notified by the department that a breeding facility has been designated a Category A, Category B, or trace-in facility, [or Tier 1 facility], a permittee may, in lieu of meeting the applicable testing requirements of subsections (d) – (f)[(d) — (g)] of this section, request the development of a custom testing plan by the department in consultation with TAHC based upon an epidemiological assessment conducted by the department and TAHC. A custom testing plan under this subsection is not valid unless it has been approved by the department and TAHC.

                         (1) The department shall temporarily suspend the applicable testing provisions of subsections (d)(2)(A), (e)(2)(A) and (E), and (f)[(g)] of this section while the epidemiological assessment and custom testing plan development under this subsection take place.

                         (2) (A) – (B) (No change.)

                                  (C) If a permittee chooses to decline participation in a custom testing plan under this subsection, the provisions of subsections (d)(2)(A), (e)(2)(A) and (E), and (f)[(g)] of this section take effect as of the date of the notification required by subparagraph (B) of this paragraph and all time-dependent calculations of those subsections begin.

                                  (D) If a permittee agrees in writing to comply with the provisions of a custom testing plan under this subsection, the custom testing plan replaces the testing provisions of subsections (d)(2)(A), (e)(2)(A) and (E), and (f)[(g)] of this section.

                         (3) A breeding facility designated by the department as Category A, Category B, or trace-in[, or Tier 1] is NMQ as of the date of such notification and remains NMQ until the provisions of the custom testing plan under this subsection have been satisfied.

                         (4) If for any reason the permittee does not comply with the provisions of a custom testing plan under this subsection, the provisions of subsections (d) – (f)[(g)] of this section resume applicability.

                         (5) The terms of a custom testing plan under this subsection are non-negotiable and final.

                 [(i) Nursing facilities.]

                         [(1) Notwithstanding NMQ status, deer less than 120 days of age in any Category A, Category B, trace-in, and or Tier 1 facility may be transferred to a registered nursing facility, provided:]

                                  [(A) the facility from which the deer are transferred was MQ at the time the facility was designated Category A, Category B, trace-in, or Tier 1; and]

                                  [(B) no deer from any other breeding facility are or have been present in the nursing facility during the current reporting year.]

                         [(2) A registered nursing facility is prohibited from accepting deer from more than one breeding facility in one reporting year.]

                         [(3) No person may possess deer older than 120 days of age in a nursing facility.]

                 (h)[(j)]Upon notification by the department that CWD is suspected in a deer as a result of ante-mortem testing in a facility, the facility is automatically NMQ and the permittee shall:

                         (1) – (3) (No change.)

        This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s authority to adopt.

        Issue in Austin, Texas, on