Commission Meeting Agenda Item No. 6
Presenter: Alan Cain

Action
Comprehensive Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Management Rules
Triple T Provisions
Recommended Adoption of Proposed Changes
March 24, 2022

I.      Executive Summary:  The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) staff seeks adoption of a proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Management Rules regarding movement of deer via Trap, Transport, and Transplant (Triple T) permits. The proposed amendment lifts the current moratorium on the issuance of Triple T permits and establishes testing requirements and other provisions regarding prospective trap sites for Triple T activities involving deer. The proposed amendment would:

 

II.     Discussion:  Under Texas Parks and Wildlife Code chapter 43, subchapter E, TPWD may issue permits authorizing the trapping, transporting, and transplanting of game animals and game birds for better wildlife management (popularly referred to as “Triple T” permits). At the November 4, 2021, Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission meeting, the Commission adopted extensive revisions to the Comprehensive CWD Management Rules at 31 Texas Administrative Code chapter 65, subchapter B, in response to additional detections of CWD at multiple deer breeding facilities. A component of that rulemaking was a temporary moratorium on the issuance of Triple T permits for deer; however, the Commission directed staff to develop proposed disease-management provisions for rules governing the movement of deer under Triple T permits so as to allow the resumption of Triple T permit activities as soon as possible. The proposed rule (located at Exhibit A) would establish testing requirements and other provisions necessary to allow the resumption of Triple T permit issuance for deer while providing minimum acceptable assurance that CWD is not spread to additional properties, facilities, or populations as a result of Triple T activities.

At the Commission Work Session meeting on January 26, 2022, the staff was authorized to publish the proposed rule in the Texas Register for public comment.  The proposed rule appeared in the February 18, 2022, issue of the Texas Register(47 TexReg 744).  A summary of public comment on the proposed rule will be presented at the time of the hearing.

III.   Recommendation:  The staff recommends that the Commission adopt the proposed motion:

“The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission adopts amendments to 31 Texas Administrative Code §65.97, concerning Testing and Movement of Deer Pursuant to a Triple T or TTP Permit, with changes as necessary to the proposed text as published in the February 18, 2022, issue of the Texas Register (47 TexReg 744).”

Attachment – 1

  1. Exhibit A – Proposed Amendment to Triple T Provisions in the Comprehensive CWD Management Rules

Commission Agenda Item No. 6
Exhibit A

COMPREHENSIVE CWD RULES

TRIPLE T PERMIT PROVISIONS

PROPOSAL PREAMBLE

1. Introduction.

        The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (the department) proposes amendments to 31 TAC §65.97, concerning Testing and Movement of Deer Pursuant to a Triple T or TTP Permit. The proposed rule would establish chronic wasting disease (CWD) testing requirements and other provisions for properties that are prospective trap sites for permits to trap, transport, and transplant game animals and game birds (colloquially known as “Triple T” permits). The department earlier this year promulgated rules that made extensive changes to the CWD management rules (46 TexReg 8724) contained in Chapter 65, Subchapter B (commonly referred to as the “comprehensive rules”). Among other things, that rulemaking imposed a temporary moratorium on the issuance of Triple T permits for deer; however, the Parks and Wildlife Commission directed staff to develop a proposal as quickly as possible to allow resumption of program functionality. The intent of this proposed rulemaking is to restore the availability of the Triple T permit program for deer while minimizing the probability of CWD being spread as a result of deer translocation activities.

        CWD is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder that affects cervid species such as white-tailed deer, mule deer, elk, red deer, sika, and others (susceptible species). CWD is classified as a TSE (transmissible spongiform encephalopathy), a family of diseases that includes scrapie (found in sheep) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, found in cattle and commonly known as “Mad Cow Disease”), and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) in humans. CWD is transmitted both directly (through deer-to-deer contact) and indirectly (through environmental contamination).

        White-tailed deer and mule deer are indigenous species authorized to be regulated by the department under the Parks and Wildlife Code. Under Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter E, the department may issue permits authorizing the trapping, transporting, and transplanting of game animals and game birds for wildlife management (popularly referred to as “Triple T” permits).

        The department, along with the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC), has been engaged in an ongoing battle against CWD in Texas since 2002. The recent detections of CWD in multiple deer breeding facilities created an unprecedented situation because it greatly increased the probability that CWD could have been spread to many new locations, including breeder deer release sites that subsequently could become trap sites for deer relocations under Triple T permits, which introduces even greater concerns regarding disease propagation.

        Much remains unknown about CWD. The peculiarities of its transmission (how it is passed from animal to animal), infection rate (the frequency of occurrence through time or other comparative standard), incubation period (the time from exposure to clinical manifestation), and potential for transmission to other species are still being investigated. There is currently no scientific evidence to indicate that CWD is transmissible to humans; however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization strongly recommend testing animals from CWD Zones prior to consumption, and if positive, recommend not consuming the meat. What is known is that CWD is invariably fatal to cervids. Additionally, the apparent persistence of CWD in contaminated environments represents a significant obstacle to eradication of CWD from either captive or free-ranging cervid populations. The potential implications of CWD for Texas and its multi-billion-dollar ranching, hunting, real estate, tourism, and wildlife management-related economies could be significant, unless it is contained and controlled.

        The department has engaged in frequent rulemaking over the years to address both the general threat posed by CWD and the repeated detection of CWD in deer breeding facilities. In 2005, the department adopted rules (30 TexReg 3595) that closed the Texas border to the entry of out-of-state captive white-tailed and mule deer and increased regulatory requirements regarding disease monitoring and record keeping. In 2012, based on recommendations from the department’s CWD Task Force (an ad hoc group of deer management professionals, landowners, veterinarians, scientists, and deer breeders), the department adopted rules (37 TexReg 10231) to implement a CWD containment strategy in response to the detection of CWD in free-ranging mule deer located in the Hueco Mountains, the first detection of CWD in Texas. In 2015, the department discovered CWD in a deer breeding facility in Medina County and adopted emergency rules (40 TexReg 5566) to respond immediately to the threat, followed by rules (41 TexReg 815) intended to function through the 2015-2016 hunting season. Working closely with TAHC and with the assistance of the Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution of the University of Texas School of Law, the department intensively utilized input from stakeholders and interested parties to develop and adopt comprehensive CWD management rules in 2016 (41 TexReg 5726), including provisions for live testing (“ante-mortem”) of deer for CWD. Since 2002, the department has made a continuous, concerted effort to involve the regulated community and stakeholders in the process of developing appropriate CWD response, management, and containment strategies, including input from the Breeder User Group (an ad hoc group of deer breeders), the CWD Task Force, the Private Lands Advisory Committee (an advisory group of private landowners from various ecological regions of the state), and the White-tailed Deer and Mule Deer Advisory Committees (advisory groups of landowners, hunters, wildlife managers, and other stakeholders).

        The Triple T permit is a deer management tool for land managers and landowners, allowing surplus deer to be moved to places where deer are needed. The department has issued 149 Triple T permits at an average rate of 29.8 permits per year during the past five years. Some of these transplantations involve trapping at sites where breeder deer have been released or transferred in the past, as well as at places that have received deer via Triple T permit from other trap sites where breeder deer were transferred. As mentioned earlier in this preamble, the department engaged in rulemaking earlier this year in response to the recent detections of CWD in multiple deer breeding facilities, from which the department was forced to conclude that the rules in effect were not, as previously believed, adequate for providing assurances that CWD could be detected in breeding facilities before it could be spread to additional breeding facilities and free-ranging populations. Because breeder deer have been transferred to many properties that could become potential trap sites for Triple T activities, the department became concerned that Triple T activities could be or become a contributor to the spread of CWD.

        Under current rule (which, as noted, is temporarily suspended, but would be restored under the proposed amendment), the department will not issue a Triple T permit unless "not detected" post-mortem test results have been submitted for 15 test-eligible deer from the trap site. The department has determined that this standard provides insufficient confidence that CWD is not present or being spread by Triple T activities, particularly at places where breeder deer have been transferred in the past. Therefore, the proposed amendment, while retaining the current five-year time window concerning ineligibility for permit issuance as a result of breeder deer transfers for purposes of release, would provide for increased surveillance at properties where breeder deer have never been transferred and at properties where breeder deer were transferred at least five years prior to permit application.

        Unlike deer breeding facilities (where the population is captive and every deer is theoretically available for testing), in free-range settings such as Triple T release sites, not all deer are readily available or in fact easy to locate. As a result, the department concluded that post-mortem testing of harvested deer was the most viable and appropriate vehicle for establishing a reasonable confidence that CWD does not exist at the trap site. The proposed amendment would impose a basic testing regime by requiring, prior to authorization of any trapping activities under a Triple T permit, the post-mortem testing of at least 60 deer; the tagging of all deer transferred under a Triple T permit; and continuous post-mortem testing on all trap sites at the rate of 15 deer per year in order to maintain trap site eligibility for Triple T permit activities. The proposed amendment would require continuous testing to ensure that long-term surveillance is conducted following establishment of trap site status (via submission of 60 “not detected” tests, as applicable) and would provide the department a reasonable degree of confidence that CWD is not present in that deer population, and thus, not likely to be transmitted to other locations and populations if the site is used as a trap site for Triple T activities. Therefore, the proposed amendment would impose a continuous testing regime and stipulate that any gap or lacunae in testing efforts would cause the testing requirements of the section to start over again in order to regain eligibility for trap site status. The 60-sample standard is the minimum sample size needed to attain 95 percent confidence that CWD is not present at a five percent prevalence for an infinite, homogenous population with random disease distribution.

        In developing the proposed rule, the department identified three risk categories presented by Triple T trap sites with respect to disease transmission. Of greatest concern are trap sites that are under a hold order or quarantine. A hold order prohibits the movement of a herd, animal, or animal product pending the determination of CWD status. A hold order is issued when a test result of “suspect” at a deer breeding facility (“index facility”) is received and applies to all locations that are epidemiologically connected to that facility, directly or indirectly (i.e., where breeder deer have been transferred directly from the suspect breeding facility, or, in some cases, via an intermediate breeding facility). A quarantine restricts animal or animal product movement from or onto a property as a result of verification of the existence of or exposure to CWD. This category of release site is of the greatest concern because deer at such sites have been exposed to a positive breeding facility, are potentially infected, and therefore are potentially able to spread the disease to additional locations and animals. The current rules prohibit trap-site authorization only for sites that are under a hold order at the time. The proposed amendment would prohibit trapping for Triple T purposes at sites that are subject to a hold order or quarantine and would provide that a property that has been subject to a hold order or quarantine is eligible to be a trap site beginning five years from the date that the hold order or quarantine is lifted. The proposed provision is necessary because evaluation of disease status and mitigation of disease transmission after breeder deer are transferred and released are inherently more problematic than evaluation of disease status and mitigation of disease transmission before breeder deer are moved from a breeding facility. The current rule was designed to temporarily halt deer movement from affected facilities and locations until testing efficacy could reach acceptable levels; however, given the recent detections of CWD at multiple facilities despite rules intended to prevent it, the department cannot be certain that CWD is not present at prospective trap sites where breeder deer from epidemiologically linked facilities have been transferred and released in the past.

        Of less, but still very significant concern, are prospective trap sites that have received a breeder deer. This category is of concern because of the continuing detection of CWD in deer breeding facilities. As stated earlier in this preamble and based on epidemiological investigation, it has become quite apparent that the CWD testing requirements in effect for breeding facilities prior to 2021 were inadequate for detecting CWD in a timely fashion. Although the recently adopted comprehensive rules definitively improve disease surveillance at breeding facilities, they do not address the disease-risk scenarios presented by deer transferred from breeding facilities under the previous rules. Consequently, the proposed amendment would require the submission of a minimum of 60 post-mortem test results of “not detected” for samples collected on prospective trap sites that have been the site of a breeder deer transfer for purposes of release, provided at least five years have elapsed prior to the collection of any samples and the last release of breeder deer at the prospective trap site. The department notes that CWD (especially at low prevalence) is not randomly distributed and that populations are not completely homogenous (because of barriers such as high fences, habitat type and quality, the presence of humans, and so on); however, site-specific testing at this intensity is expected to provide minimal assurance that movement from trap sites where breeder deer have been previously transferred and released (including breeder bucks temporarily possessed for breeding purposes under a Deer Management Permit) will not result in the spread of CWD to additional areas and populations. In sum, the testing and trapping requirements for these trap sites should provide minimal assurance that CWD is not spread via Triple T activities involving trap sites where breeder deer have been transferred and released in the past.

        The remaining risk category is represented by trap sites that have never received a breeder deer. Compared to the other two categories, these sites are the least likely to present a risk of CWD transmission because there is a demonstrably minimal epidemiological connectivity with deer breeding facilities (which, in Texas and nationally, have been shown to have the greatest capacity to amplify and spread CWD) and they are not located in CWD Containment or Surveillance Zones. The post-mortem testing prescribed by the proposed rules (60 deer prior to permit authorization, 15 deer per year afterwards), in concert with the lower risk of CWD introduction associated with sites that have never received breeder deer, are believed by the department to be adequate to address disease risk. The proposed amendment would allow the required 60 post-mortem tests to be conducted in a single year or over the course of consecutive years, provided a minimum of 15 test results per year are submitted and the samples are collected in consecutive years. The 60-sample standard is the minimum sample size needed to attain 95 percent confidence that CWD is not present at a five percent prevalence for an infinite, homogenous population with random disease distribution.

        The proposed amendment would alter the timelines for test validity specified in current subsection (a)(6) and (7), which is necessary because the proposed amendments would predicate permit eligibility on the basis of continuous testing effort; thus, the testing windows are necessary for purposes of verifying compliance with annual testing requirements over time.

        The proposed amendment also would reorganize existing provisions by moving the contents of current subsection (a)(3) into the list in subsection (a)(2) of situations in which the department will not authorize trapping for Triple T purposes.

        The proposed amendment also would prohibit the authorization of trapping activities at any site wholly or partially within a five-mile radius surrounding a property containing a breeding facility that the department has designated NMQ (non-movement qualified, or prohibited from transferring deer) under the provisions of §65.99, concerning Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD, but would allow such sites to become eligible to be a trap site once the department has restored MQ status to the facility in question and the provisions of this section as applicable, have been met. The five-mile radius was chosen after considering feedback received from various advisory groups along with deer movement data (the department notes that this value exceeds the standard imposed by department rules regarding CWD containment zones under Chapter 65, Subchapter B, Division 1). The proposed amendment also would allow for approval of trapping activities at such sites if the department conducts a trap site assessment that stipulates specific testing and management protocols the department deems necessary to assure that adequate disease surveillance exists and will be maintained at the trap site, and the permittee and the property owner of the trap site (if different persons) agree in writing to abide by the terms of the testing and management protocols prescribed by the department as a condition of trap site approval. The department considers that given the probable very low number of potential instances in which a prospective trap site could be within the radius established by the proposed amendment, it is feasible that a trap site assessment prescribing a testing and management protocol that could offer assurance that Triple T activities at the site would not result in unacceptable risk of disease transmission; therefore, the proposed amendment would provide for that possibility, provided the permittee and the owner of the trap site agree in writing to the terms and conditions of the testing and management protocol. The department has determined that any authorization of Triple T activities within an area of heightened disease concerns pursuant to special testing and management protocols should be in the context of a written agreement that specifically identifies the responsibilities and obligations of the permittee and the landowner as well as the consequences for failure to comply.

        Additionally, these epidemiologically linked facilities are high-fenced, which further reduces deer movements and distribution and the potential spread of CWD beyond these facilities. Similarly, the proposed amendment would prohibit the authorization of trapping activities at any site wholly or partially within a ten-mile radius surrounding a property containing a release site under a hold order or quarantine. The ten-mile radius was chosen after considering feedback received from various advisory groups along with deer movement data (the department notes that this value exceeds the standard imposed by department rules regarding CWD surveillance zones under Chapter 65, Subchapter B, Division 1). The department considers that given the probable very low number of potential instances in which a prospective trap site could be within the radius established by the proposed amendment, it is feasible that a trap site assessment prescribing a testing and management protocol that could offer assurance that Triple T activities at the site would not result in unacceptable risk of disease transmission; therefore, the proposed amendment would provide for that possibility, provided the permittee and the owner of the trap site agree in writing to the terms and conditions of the testing and management protocol. The department has determined that any authorization of Triple T activities within an area of heightened disease concerns pursuant to special testing and management protocols should be in the context of a written agreement that specifically identifies the responsibilities and obligations of the permittee and the landowner as well as the consequences for failure to comply.

        Similarly, the proposed amendment would allow for movement of deer under a Triple T permit at properties unable to meet the 60-test threshold for permit issuance, provided the trap site and the release site are adjacent, contiguous tracts owned by the same person, the department has conducted a trap site assessment that stipulates specific testing and management protocols the department deems necessary to assure that adequate disease surveillance exists and will be maintained at the trap site, and the permittee and the property owner of the trap site (if different persons) agree in writing to abide by the terms of the testing and management protocols prescribed by the department. Under current rule, testing is not required in such scenarios; however, the department has concluded, in light of recent detections of CWD, the deer population on any release site is for epidemiological purposes completely isolated from the trap site deer population, which represents a CWD transmission risk to additional tracts of land under the same ownership that otherwise may not have been exposed. Consequently, the CWD risk of the trap site must be assessed prior to the movement of any deer in order to gain confidence that CWD is not present.

        The proposed amendment would require all deer released via Triple T permits to be tagged, prior to release, with an external plastic tag, approved by the department, that is brightly colored and clearly visible so as to allow the information on the tag to be read via binoculars or spotting scope at a distance of 100 yards. In the event that CWD is detected at a site that epidemiological investigations reveal is connected to a Triple T release, the department needs to be able to quickly identify the specific deer that were released in order to conduct post-mortem testing. By requiring conspicuous marking of Triple T deer, the department intends to facilitate that.

        Finally, the proposed amendment would specifically provide that changes in property ownership or size do not affect the applicability of the section. The department wishes to be explicitly clear that subdividing a property or transferring ownership following the release of breeder deer will not alter the property’s eligibility or ineligibility for consideration as a trap site for Triple T activities, which is a necessary measure intended to prevent the spread of CWD.

2. Fiscal Note.

        Mitch Lockwood, Big Game Program Director, has determined that for the first five years that the amendment as proposed is in effect, there will be no additional fiscal implications to state or local governments of enforcing or administering the rule as proposed.

3. Public Benefit/Cost Note.

        Mr. Lockwood also has determined that for each of the first five years the proposed rule is in effect:

        (A) The public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed rules will be a minimally acceptable probability that CWD will be detected at Triple T trap sites if it exists at a relatively low prevalence and an attendant reduction in the probability of CWD being spread from properties where it might exist to additional populations, thus ensuring the public of continued enjoyment of the resource and the continued beneficial economic impacts of hunting in Texas.

        (B) There will be an adverse economic impact on persons required to comply with the rules as proposed. The impact will be the costs associated with the testing requirements imposed by the proposed amendment, which would consist of the cost of 60 post-mortem CWD tests prior to trapping authorization, and the cost of 15 CWD post-mortem test every year thereafter if the landowner desires to maintain eligibility. The department notes that although the rule stipulates the testing requirements for issuance of Triple T permits, no person is required by any provision of law to obtain Triple T permits; that choice is purely voluntary.

        The cost of a post-mortem CWD test administered by the Texas A&M Veterinary Medicine Diagnostic Lab (TVMDL) is a minimum of $25, to which is added a $7 accession fee (which may cover multiple samples submitted at the same time). If a whole head is submitted to TVDML there is an additional $20 sample collection fee, plus a $20 disposal fee. Thus, the minimum fee for each post-mortem test would be $32, plus any veterinary cost (which the department cannot quantify, as the cost of veterinary services varies greatly from place to place), and the maximum fee for each post-mortem test would be $70. The department notes that it is possible for any person to be trained and certified at no cost to be a sample collector, which would reduce the cost of compliance accordingly. Therefore, the department estimates the maximum cost to persons seeking a Triple T permit for deer would be $4,200 (60 post-mortem tests at a cost of $70 per test).

        (C) Under the provisions of Government Code, Chapter 2006, a state agency must prepare an economic impact statement and a regulatory flexibility analysis for a rule that may have an adverse economic effect on small businesses and micro-businesses. Those guidelines state that an agency need only consider a proposed rule’s "direct adverse economic impacts" to small businesses and micro-businesses to determine if any further analysis is required. For that purpose, the department considers "direct economic impact" to mean a requirement that would directly impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements; impose taxes or fees; result in lost sales or profits; adversely affect market competition; or require the purchase or modification of equipment or services.

        The department has determined that the proposed rule regulates various aspects of the issuance and use of permits that authorize the temporary possession of public wildlife resources and do not authorize the sale or purchase of live game animals and therefore do not directly affect small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities. Therefore, neither the economic impact statement nor the regulatory flexibility analysis described in Government Code, Chapter 2006, is required.

        (D) The department has not drafted a local employment impact statement under the Administrative Procedures Act, §2001.022, as the agency has determined that the rules as proposed will not impact local economies.

        (E) The department has determined that Government Code, §2001.0225 (Regulatory Analysis of Major Environmental Rules), does not apply to the proposed rules.

        (F) The department has determined that there will not be a taking of private real property, as defined by Government Code, Chapter 2007, as a result of the proposed rules.

        (G) In compliance with the requirements of Government Code, §2001.0221, the department has prepared the following Government Growth Impact Statement (GGIS).  The rules as proposed, if adopted, will:

                 (1) neither create nor eliminate a government program;

                 (2) not result in an increase or decrease in the number of full-time equivalent employee needs;

                 (3) not result in a need for additional General Revenue funding;

                 (4) not affect the amount of any fee;

                 (5) not create a new regulation, or limit an existing regulation, but will expand an existing regulation (by imposing additional testing requirements on all prospective Triple T permittees);

                 (6) neither increase nor decrease the number of individuals subject to regulation; and

                 (7) not positively or adversely affect the state’s economy.

4. Request for Public Comment.

        Comments on the proposed rules may be submitted to Alan Cain at 830-480-4038, e-mail: alan.cain@tpwd.texas.gov. or via the department website at www.tpwd.texas.gov.

5. Statutory Authority.

        The amendment is proposed under Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter E, which authorizes the commission to make regulations governing the trapping, transporting, and transplanting of game animals

        The proposed amendment affects Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 43, Subchapter E.

6. Rule Text.
        §65.97. Testing and Movement of Deer Pursuant to a Triple T or TTP Permit.

                 (a) General.

                         (1) [On the effective date of this paragraph the department will cease the issuance of Triple T permits for deer until further notice.]

                         [(2)Except as provided by subparagraph (I) of this paragraph, the [The] department will not issue a Triple T permit authorizing deer to be trapped at a:

                                  (A) site where [release site that has received] breeder deer have been transferred within five years of the application for a Triple T permit;

                                  (B) [release] site that is not in compliance with [has failed to fulfill] the applicable testing requirements of this division;

                                  (C) [any] site where a deer has been confirmed positive for CWD;

                                  (D) [any] site where a deer has tested "suspect" for CWD; [or]

                                  (E) [any] site subject to [under] a hold order or quarantine

                                 (F) site wholly or partially within a five-mile radius surrounding a property containing a deer breeding facility that the department has designated NMQ under the provisions of §65.99 of this title (relating to Breeding Facilities Epidemiologically Connected to Deer Infected with CWD); provided however, that such a site is eligible to be a trap site once the department has restored MQ status to the deer breeding facility in question and the provisions of this section, as applicable, have been met; 

                                 (G) site wholly or partially within a ten-mile radius surrounding a property containing a release site subject to a hold order or quarantine; or 

                                 (H) site that the department determines, based on an epidemiological assessment, represents an unacceptable risk for the spread of CWD.

                                 (I) The department may approve a prospective trap site described by  subparagraph (F) or (G) of this paragraph only if:

                                         (i) the department conducts a trap site assessment that stipulates specific testing and management protocols the department deems necessary to assure that adequate disease surveillance exists and will be maintained at the trap site; and 

                                         (ii) the permittee and the property owner of the trap site agree in writing to abide by the terms of the testing and management protocols prescribed by the department as a condition of trap site approval.

                          [(3) In addition to the reasons for denying a Triple T permit as provided in §65.107 of this title (relating to Permit Application and Processing) and §65.109 of this title (relating to Issuance of Permit), the department will not issue a Triple T permit if the department determines, based on epidemiological assessment and consultation with TAHC that to do so would create an unacceptable risk for the spread of CWD.]

                         (2)[(4)In addition to the marking required by §65.102 of this title (relating to Disease Detection Requirements), all [All] deer released under the provisions of this section must be tagged prior to release in one ear with:

                                  (A) a plastic tag approved by the department that is:

                                          (i) externally applied (affixed so as to be suspended from the ear and not placed within or so as to be obscured by the ear);

                                          (ii) a bright color that distinctly contrasts with the pelage of the deer to which it is attached, as well as any surrounding foliage or background color; and

                                          (iii) clearly visible in such a fashion as to allow the tag to be easily seen and the information on the tag to be read at a distance of at least 100 yards by binoculars, spotting scope, or other magnifying device. 

                                  (B) a button-type RFID tag approved by the department [, in addition to the marking required by §65.102 of this title (relating to Disease Detection Requirements)].

                                  (C) the department may specify the [RFID] tag information that must be submitted to the department.

                         (3)[(5)] Nothing in this section authorizes the take of deer except as authorized by applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to laws and regulations regarding seasons, bag limits, and means and methods as provided in Subchapter A of this chapter (relating to Statewide Hunting Proclamation).

                         (4)[(6)] Except for a permit issued for the removal of urban deer, a test result is not valid for fulfilling the testing requirements of this section unless the sample was collected and tested between[after] the Saturday closest to September 30 of one [the] year and February 28 of the following year [for which activities of the permit are authorized].

                         (5)[(7)] For permits issued for the removal of urban deer, test samples may be collected between April 1 and March 31 of the following year [the time of application].

                         (6) The provisions of this section apply irrespective of changes in property size or ownership.

                 (b) Testing Requirements for Triple T Permit.

                         (1) The provisions of this paragraph apply on any property identified as a prospective trap site in an application for a Triple T permit if department records indicate deer that were ever in a deer breeding facility have ever been transferred to that property for any reason. The department will not authorize trapping activities under this paragraph until:

                                  (A) at least five years have elapsed since the last release of breeder deer on the property; and

                                  (B) the applicant has submitted at least 60 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results obtained from deer killed at the prospective trap site. 

                                  (C) The test results required by this subparagraph may be from samples collected during the year in which the permit application is filed.

                                  (D) If the test results required by this paragraph are collected over multiple years prior to permit application:

                                          (i) a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results from the prospective trap site must be submitted for each year; and

                                          (ii) the period of years for which test results are submitted must be continuous (i.e., if the samples are collected in each of four years, each of three years, or each of two years, those years must be consecutive years).

                                          (iii) Test results from samples collected earlier than five years from the last date breeder deer were transferred to the prospective trap site are not valid for the purposes of this section.

                                  (E) Following any trapping activities authorized under a Triple T permit, a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results must be submitted annually for a property to remain eligible as a trap site for future Triple T permit activities.

                                  (F) The department will not authorize trapping activities at any property where the continuous testing history required by this subparagraph has not been achieved and maintained. 

                                  (G) Eligibility for consideration as a trap site may be re-established by providing a minimum of 60 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results from samples collected in consecutive years, provided:

                                          (i) a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results are submitted per year; and

                                          (ii) no breeder deer have been transferred to the prospective trap site within five years of the first year for which test results are submitted.

                         (2) The provisions of this paragraph apply to a property identified as a prospective trap site in an application for a Triple T permit if department records indicate that breeder deer have never been transferred to that property for any reason. The department will not authorize trapping activities until the applicant has submitted at least 60 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results obtained from deer killed at the prospective trap site in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. 

                                  (A) The test results required by this subparagraph may be from samples collected in the year of the permit application, samples collected the year prior to permit application, or from samples collected in more than one year prior to permit application; however, if the samples are obtained over multiple years prior to the year of permit application:

                                          (i) a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results from the prospective trap site must be submitted for each year; and

                                          (ii) the period of years for which test results are submitted must be continuous (i.e., if the samples are collected in each of four years, each of three years, each of two years, the year prior, or the year of permit application, those years must be consecutive years).

                                  (B) for a property to remain eligible as a trap site for future Triple T permit activities, a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results from deer at the property must be submitted annually.

                                  (C) The department will not authorize trapping activities at any property where the continuous annual testing history required by this paragraph has not been achieved and maintained following the issuance of a Triple T permit. 

                                  (D) Eligibility for consideration as a trap site may be re-established by providing a minimum of 60 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results from samples collected:

                                          (i) in the year of or the year immediately preceding permit application; or

                                          (ii) in multiple years immediately preceding permit application, provided a minimum of 15 post-mortem “Not Detected” test results are submitted per year.

                         (3) A property that has been subject to a hold order or quarantine is eligible to be a trap site for Triple T activities under the provisions of this section, as applicable, beginning five years from the date that the hold order or quarantine is lifted. 

                          (4) In the instance that an applicant is unable for whatever reason supply the 60 test samples for permit issuance as required by this section, the department may approve the movement of deer under a Triple T permit, provided:

                                  (A) the trap site and the release site are owned by the same person;

                                  (B) the trap site and the release site are on adjacent, contiguous tracts; and

                                  (C) the permittee and the property owner of the trap site (if different persons) have agreed in writing to abide by the terms of testing and management protocols prescribed by the department following a trap site assessment performed by the department that stipulates specific testing and management protocols the department deems necessary to assure that adequate disease surveillance exists and will be maintained at the trap site. 

                         [(1)The department will not issue a Triple T permit unless "not detected" post-mortem test results have been submitted for 15 test-eligible deer from the trap site.]

                         [(2) CWD testing is not required for deer trapped on any property if the deer are being moved to adjacent, contiguous tracts owned by the same person who owns the trap site property.]

                 (c) (No change.)

        This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s authority to adopt.

        Issued in Austin, Texas, on